New Anticorruption Force files lawsuit against the election of the National Registrar
18 november 2019
The Anticorruption Social Response Force (FUERSA) officially notifies the public that on Friday 15 November 2019, it filed a lawsuit to the Council of State for electoral annulment, against the appointment of Mr. Alexander Vega as the National Registrar.
The International Institute for Anticorruption Studies celebrates the association of national and international experts
18 june 2018
Tom Devine, Eugene Soltes, Rubén Avendaño and Rafael Rincón, all of whom are experts in whistleblower protection, white collar crime, anticorruption, transparency and integrity, corporate governance, and international arbitration, join the International Institute on Anticorruption Studies.
The International Institute on Anticorruption Studies (IIAS) announced that Tom Devine, Eugene Soltes, Rubén Avendaño and Rafael Rincón have joined their team, sharing the news with the general public, as well as the country’s anticorruption community.
The Latin American Compliance Network met in Bogotá to discuss secure reporting channels
21 june 2018
As part of its 2018 program, the Latin American Compliance Network met on 6 April 2018 at Bogotá’s Deloitte Center of Excellence. The meeting, coordinated by the International Institute on Anticorruption Studies (IIAS), which organizes its Executive Secretariat, discussed the first of three major topics: Secure Denunciation Channels, which are of paramount importance in Corruption Risk Prevention Systems, both within public institutions and private companies.
RANKING OF ACCESS TO LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT
Congressmen are divided almost down the middle when it comes to their financial accountability
8 March 2018
According to a study by the International Institute on Anticorruption Studies, Congress representatives are divided almost down the middle when it comes to their financial accountability.
The study, carried out by the International Institute on Anticorruption Studies during the first week of March found that only 68% of a total of 98 Senators  responded to requests for information related to the management of their work in Congress.
A similar trend was detected in the Chamber, where only 66% of Representatives replied.
On a scale of -26 to 26, where zero (0) represents the minimum information that is expected provided, -26 represents extreme
disappointment with the expected information and +26 the proactive delivery of information in addition to the expected. The average score of the evaluated Senators was -6.19 and -2.96 in the Chamber.
This means that both Senators and representatives to the Chamber tend to deliver less information than any citizen expects to know about their activities.
 Those congress representatives who are imprisoned or who have resigned from office were not evaluated